Dynamic Risk
A security officer evaluates and determines dynamic risk by following a process of observation, assessment, and analysis. The process generally involves the following steps:

Observation: The security officer begins by observing the environment and identifying potential threats or hazards. This may involve looking for signs of suspicious behavior, identifying vulnerable areas or objects, and monitoring changes in the environment that could increase the risk of an incident.

Assessment: The officer then assesses the risk level based on the observations made during the observation phase. This may involve analyzing the likelihood and potential impact of various threats or hazards, and considering factors such as the value of the assets being protected, the level of security measures in place, and the potential consequences of an incident.

Analysis: Finally, the officer analyzes the data collected during the observation and assessment phases to determine the level of dynamic risk. This may involve weighing the likelihood and impact of various threats and hazards against the security measures in place, and identifying areas where additional security measures may be needed to reduce the risk level.

In addition to these steps, security officers may also use various tools and techniques to evaluate and determine dynamic risk, such as risk assessments, security audits, and security surveys. They may also consult with other security professionals and stakeholders to gather additional information and insights about the environment and potential risks.

Non-Dynamic Risk
A security officer evaluates and determines non-dynamic risk by following a similar process of observation, assessment, and analysis as for dynamic risk. However, non-dynamic risks refer to risks that are relatively stable and predictable over time, such as risks associated with the physical environment, organizational policies and procedures, and internal controls. Here are the steps involved:

Observation: The security officer begins by observing the environment and identifying potential non-dynamic risks. This may involve looking for hazards or vulnerabilities that are present in the environment and could lead to security incidents, such as physical security vulnerabilities, information security vulnerabilities, or compliance risks.

Assessment: The officer then assesses the risk level based on the observations made during the observation phase. This may involve analyzing the likelihood and potential impact of the identified risks, and considering factors such as the value of the assets being protected, the level of security measures in place, and the potential consequences of an incident.

Analysis: Finally, the officer analyzes the data collected during the observation and assessment phases to determine the level of non-dynamic risk. This may involve weighing the likelihood and impact of various risks against the security measures in place, and identifying areas where additional security measures may be needed to reduce the risk level.

In addition to these steps, security officers may also use various tools and techniques to evaluate and determine non-dynamic risk, such as risk assessments, security audits, and compliance reviews. They may also consult with other security professionals and stakeholders to gather additional information and insights about the environment and potential risks.
www.secta.com.au